![]() |
Near Future & Gun Control |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 8910 |
| Author | ||||
BARREL BREAK
Platinum Member
Prettiest Princess in all the lands Joined: 08 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 December 2012 at 1:46am |
|||
|
So, KBK, going back a bit, you have no problem with people having fully functional nuclear arms? They are just tools, after all.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 December 2012 at 1:46am |
|||
Yeah this is kind of a classical cognitive bias that is pretty widely recognized.
Not from me, I don't believe.
I concur, in dealing specifically with the massacre in Connecticut. Nothing short of an all out ban and total confiscation (Which is not only unconstitutional but also near impossible) could do that. However, base-level "legislating against the legal use of a tool," specifically in the U.S., has been going on for quite some time now (Since we've been a country, at least) and has a set level of legal precedent. Even the decision and majority opinion in Heller v. DC noted that the 2nd Amendment is as open to sculpted limitation as any other amendment, as long as the ingrained purpose of allowing for defense is upheld.
We do have statistics, however, that point to handguns being the main tool of firearm-based homicide. It's why I'm a proponent of handgun licensing. I concur with you, however: Arbitrary things often contained in AR bans are often based in nothing more than random guesswork. Edited by agentwhale007 - 23 December 2012 at 1:51am |
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 December 2012 at 1:47am |
|||
|
I feel like I've got a thread full of people arguing against something I'm not arguing for.
|
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 December 2012 at 1:57am |
|||
I guess both ideological extremes in the gun control debate are fans of absurd hyperbole for the sake of.
|
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
BARREL BREAK
Platinum Member
Prettiest Princess in all the lands Joined: 08 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 December 2012 at 1:58am |
|||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Kayback
Platinum Member
Ask me about my Kokido Joined: 25 July 2002 Location: South Africa Status: Online Points: 3886 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 December 2012 at 7:38am |
|||
|
Nuclear weapons? Probably not. Mostly because I don't think the average citizen has the correct security for true WMD's.
I don't think there should be much law covering Diesel and Fertilizer though. I routinely use explosives in my hobbies. Mostly black powder I will grant you, but it is still an explosive. The people trying to get hold of a nuke will be slightly better equipped and slightly better motivated than someone possibly breaking in to your house to steal a firearm. AgentWhale007, going by numbers fully automatic machineguns should be totally de-regulated then. The number of true automatic weapons used in crimes in the states is sitting at something below 0.3% IIRC, and that number was from before the 1986 Firearm Owners Protection Act. Even back in the 80's when Miami was "machinegun Mecca" they only recovered two automatic weapons in years of police work. I wasn't specifically replying to you, I was just saying that I've even heard people say they don't care what happens to X gun so long as they get to keep Y gun. KBK Edited by Kayback - 23 December 2012 at 7:40am |
||||
|
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo. H = 2
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Kayback
Platinum Member
Ask me about my Kokido Joined: 25 July 2002 Location: South Africa Status: Online Points: 3886 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 December 2012 at 7:42am |
|||
You may be right, but I did say it SEEMS more like it, not that it IS like that. However I have heard various anti groups applauding the efforts of other groups even though they have not achieved the main aim of the first group. One step and all that. |
||||
|
Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo. H = 2
|
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 December 2012 at 11:49am |
|||
Fully automatic weapons are kind of a good example here -- when their danger in society was noted, legal roadblocks were put up to make it difficult to obtain said weapons, even though they were still obtainable. In turn, the use of automatic weapons in crime is really, really low. Everything I support is based, generally, on that concept, just with a much lower legal roadblock due to the nature and presence of handguns in society. Let the roadblock match the item -- which, for rifles and shotguns, would be little to none.
Mostly due to lack of availability because of the lack of an overwhelming volume, prohibitive pricing, all due to proper legislation.
I've never heard of Miami called that, and Google searches of the term only yield posts on anti-gun-law websites.
|
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 December 2012 at 2:25pm |
|||
|
Was the NFA enacted to protect the public, or allow the prohibition agents to keep their jobs?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 December 2012 at 3:23pm |
|||
|
Kind of related, this made me chuckle-
http://thepatriotperspective.wordpress.com/2012/12/23/david-gregory-violates-dc-gun-law-on-national-tv/ Also.... http://m.weeklystandard.com/blogs/gregory-mocks-lapierre-proposing-armed-guards-sends-kids-high-security-school_691057.html Edited by stratoaxe - 24 December 2012 at 3:26pm |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 2:51am |
|||
|
CA Senator Diane Feinstein has released a summary of her new 'Assault Weapon' Ban to be introduced in January:
Summary of 2013 Feinstein Assault Weapons Legislation Bans the sale, transfer, importation, or manufacturing of: -- 120 specifically-named firearms -- Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic -- Semiautomatic rifles and handguns with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds Strengthens the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban and various state bans by: -- Moving from a 2-characteristic test to a 1-characteristic test -- Eliminating the easy-to-remove bayonet mounts and flash suppressors from the characteristics test -- Banning firearms with “thumbhole stocks” and “bullet buttons” to address attempts to “work around” prior bans Bans large-capacity ammunition feeding devices capable of accepting more than 10 rounds. Protects legitimate hunters and the rights of existing gun owners by: -- Grandfathering weapons legally possessed on the date of enactment -- Exempting over 900 specifically-named weapons used for hunting or sporting purposes and -- Exempting antique, manually-operated, and permanently disabled weapons Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include: -- Background check of owner and any transferee; -- Type and serial number of the firearm; -- Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint; -- Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local law; and -- Dedicated funding for ATF to implement registration http://www.feinstein.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/files/serve/?File_id=10993387-5d4d-4680-a872-ac8ca4359119 |
||||
![]() |
||||
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 4:08am |
|||
|
http://www.policymic.com/articles/21525/dianne-feinstein-assault-weapons-ban-is-political-suicide-for-democrats
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
merc
Platinum Member
American Scotchy Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: VA, USA Status: Offline Points: 7109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 8:57am |
|||
|
i had a fun conversation with someone very anti gun about registering "assault weapons" as NFA items. they thought it was a good idea to treat them the same as machine guns... until i explained how if i have to spend the money and take the time to register as NFA i would not register them as "assault rifles" but one of the scarier already restricted classifications such as "short barreled rifle" or "Any other weapon" which would cover the current configuration but let me turn it into a much different class of firearm :D. given the fact i would already be doing all the work adding an extra form to build a silencer would be a must...
|
||||
|
saving the world, one warship at a time.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
evillepaintball
Platinum Member
Using other peoples accounts isnt nice Joined: 08 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4765 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 9:35am |
|||
|
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/british_create_a_petition_to_keep_piers_morgan_in_u_s/
"A petition calling to deport pro-gun-control CNN host Piers Morgan back to England has easily surpassed the 25,000 signatures that requires a response from the White House."
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 3:01pm |
|||
|
Saw a screen shot of Jeremy Clarksons twitter, saying it took them 40 years to get rid of Morgan, and they don't want him back.
I rather have that rambling idiot support anti-gun, than a well educated American arguing for stricter gun control. |
||||
![]() |
||||
BARREL BREAK
Platinum Member
Prettiest Princess in all the lands Joined: 08 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 3:15pm |
|||
|
Clarkson is also a racist and a blithering idiot, despite making one of my favorite TV shows, sooooo.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 3:40pm |
|||
Difference between Clarkson and Morgan. Is Clarkson talks about cars, Morgan talks about subjects he has no knowledge on. |
||||
![]() |
||||
SSOK
Platinum Member
The Savior of Christmas Joined: 01 September 2005 Location: PRNJ Status: Offline Points: 5353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 December 2012 at 4:46pm |
|||
|
I think Clarkson is satirical, not really racist.
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 8910 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |