![]() |
Near Future & Gun Control |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 10> |
| Author | ||
SSOK
Platinum Member
The Savior of Christmas Joined: 01 September 2005 Location: PRNJ Status: Offline Points: 5353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 10:54pm |
|
Bah-humbug. Reason that I ask is that you're probably the most liberal person I know that owns firearms (classy ones, IIRC). Most people are so polar when it comes to 2A issues so it is always interesting. I have to say, I really hate when super conservatives scare away liberals that are getting into the gun scene. Makes everyone that owns guns look like Obama hating rednecks.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 10:41pm |
|
I'm not really sure I've got such a thing. Complicated issues don't work well when simplified down.
|
||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||
![]() |
||
SSOK
Platinum Member
The Savior of Christmas Joined: 01 September 2005 Location: PRNJ Status: Offline Points: 5353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 10:29pm |
|
You know, I posted on the ninth page of my thread not looking to get into a peeing contest over rights (because I think it is childish to argue on the internet), but... I'll summarize the article you gave me in a few simple ways... 1. New Yorker Magazine....Liberal magazine, written to make money. Journalism, not scholarly work. 2. First thing, picture of families outside a funeral home. presumably Newtown victims. Typical media heart pulling drivel. 3. An article (most of which I didn't read) resubmitting the age old argument that the Second Amendment applies only to fighting the enemies of the state, followed by a soiled-diaper cry over the NRA. Therefore, I'm sorry but your article doesn't mean crap. It is bias at it's finest. Now, I could throw some links out there from Fox News or the NRA illustrating how most people who own baby-killing evil semiautomatic magazine fed rifles aren't murderers, or how armed citizens save lives, but I am not going to. Why? Although numbers do not lie, it won't contribute to anything in the thread. Edit: yo, whale, answer me. I genuinely would like your opinion.
Edited by SSOK - 22 December 2012 at 10:31pm |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 10:25pm |
|
And where have I advocated for that in any sense of the word?
|
||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||
![]() |
||
BARREL BREAK
Platinum Member
Prettiest Princess in all the lands Joined: 08 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 10:08pm |
|
|
e: Newer, shorter, and far less in depth... Edited by BARREL BREAK - 22 December 2012 at 10:11pm |
||
![]() |
||
SSOK
Platinum Member
The Savior of Christmas Joined: 01 September 2005 Location: PRNJ Status: Offline Points: 5353 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 10:05pm |
|
|
I haven't been on my computer for a few days and its on page nine. Wow. All I wanted to know was your opinion on what might happen.
Whale, what is your simplified, few sentences, view on firearms ownership? I'm genuinely curious, as I find you to be well rounded on subjects, liberal, and I know you own handguns. I think in all honesty NJ's system has merit, yet the Government and LEO's pull shady crap all the time with it. Once I get my firearms ID, i'm good to go buy as many long guns and ammo as I want and nobody knows I'm a psychopath. Downside is it is easy for any LEO to find a reason to deny you with or without merit. I think many moderate people on both sides of the subject could agree on that if it were a 'shall issue' deal. Of course, there will always be those that refuse any change, or want to take away a constitutional right.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
BARREL BREAK
Platinum Member
Prettiest Princess in all the lands Joined: 08 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 10:00pm |
|
|
I am a Canadian citizen and therefore cannot vote in the US. Had I been able to, I would have voted for Jill Stein, though I'm not particularly enthused about her.
Edited by BARREL BREAK - 22 December 2012 at 10:00pm |
||
![]() |
||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 9:50pm |
|
|
And did you vote for Obama this election barrel break? If you mind me asking.
|
||
![]() |
||
BARREL BREAK
Platinum Member
Prettiest Princess in all the lands Joined: 08 September 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 10662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 9:18pm |
|
|
||
![]() |
||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 8:04pm |
|
|
Dems and rhinos like government intervention, when it's not a incoveince to them.
|
||
![]() |
||
oldsoldier
Platinum Member
Frequent target of infantile obsessives Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 7:49pm |
|
|
What ever happened to the 'Big Brother' fear of George Bush? The current admins attack on privicy makes Bush's plan look like a half arsed attempt.
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 7:00pm |
|
|
Starting 2015 all vehicles will have black boxes. Around that same time, drones will be patrolling US skies. Both will help crack down on speeders I suppose.
|
||
![]() |
||
oldsoldier
Platinum Member
Frequent target of infantile obsessives Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 6:57pm |
|
|
Wait, a 'law abiding' citizen within the vast majority ogf motor vehicle operators and owners...say it ain't so. But how do we control the others that don't obey the law, what can we 'ban' to make them comply?
|
||
|
||
![]() |
||
usafpilot07
Platinum Member
FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth Joined: 31 August 2004 Location: Tokelau Status: Offline Points: 4321 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 6:48pm |
|
Nope. |
||
|
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
||
![]() |
||
oldsoldier
Platinum Member
Frequent target of infantile obsessives Joined: 10 June 2002 Status: Offline Points: 6483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 6:29pm |
|
|
Just as prohibition made alcohol 'illegal' and banned, how well did that work, and why did it not work?
Speed limits are the law and everyone of you flaunt those laws almost daily. We can go on, and the comman denominator in why these laws all failed is? If man is intent on breaking a law for whatever purpose he will, you make more laws, man just finds a justifacation to break them in his/her own mind. Whale, do you speed, can your driving at excessive speed over the posted legal speed lead to a potential death of an innocent? And your justifacation for that illegal act is? But the 'law' is clear with the posted speed limit. You 'ban' a series of weapons in the US, all you do is establish another 'black' market where the 'criminal' elements control the access, aquisition, and price, just like prohibition with alcohol, and current drug laws the 'product' will always be available. I can purchase an illegal full auto weapon any time I choose, or a RPG, simple trip to NYC, and where I know that they are probably still for sale,it is not 'they are banned' the question is how many and for what price. |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 5:59pm |
|
I have to head out for a bit, but this has been brought up quite a bit in this thread, and I'm curious: The illegal gun you could buy in an hour: Where is that gun coming from? How did it get to where it is now?
|
||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 4:30pm |
|
The one benefit that I can see in waiting periods after the initial purchase of the first firearm have is the prevention of people buying handguns and feeding them under-table into the illegal world at a quicker rate. But that same thing could be accomplished by a cap on the number someone buys in a given timeframe and increased licensing enforcement, which I support. Otherwise I agree with you -- waiting periods after the purchase of your first firearm are kinda silly. I suspect a cap and enforcement, like with OTC drugs used in meth production, would work just as well, if not better.
|
||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||
![]() |
||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 4:23pm |
|
I don't.
|
||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||
![]() |
||
Linus
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - language 6.29.10 Joined: 10 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 7908 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 3:48pm |
|
And that's my issue with the Fed as of late. Too much intrusion. The Constitution was very clear at what the job was of the federal government... protection from foreign enemies, and controlling foreign affairs. Everything else was pretty much to be left up to the states (Hello, 10th amendment clearly says that). But alas, more and more dems are trying to use the federal government to get in on the daily lives of people. As for gun laws... why do you (whale) keep mentioning waiting periods? Waiting periods are all but useless once someone already owns a gun insofar as dems say "It prevents rash decisions by making someone wait a few days before they can get the gun". Sorry, if I already own a gun, why would waiting 7-30 more days prevent me from going on a shooting rampage? |
||
|
||
![]() |
||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Offline Points: 1506 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22 December 2012 at 3:05pm |
|
|
That's the great thing about having states. They can decide whether they want strict gun laws or not. CT has pretty strict laws, and still didn't stop this.
There is no need for any more federal intervention. Leave it up to the states. They can look at different states, and decide what model they want. Don't like the laws, move to another state. Whole lot easier than moving to another country. |
||
![]() |
||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 10> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |