![]() |
Who voted? |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 567 |
| Author | ||||
Rofl_Mao
Platinum Member
request denied Joined: 27 October 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 5:06pm |
|||
Source? |
||||
![]() |
||||
Gatyr
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Begging for strikes Joined: 06 July 2003 Location: Austin, Tx Status: Offline Points: 10298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 5:20pm |
|||
Treaty of Tripoli 1796, Article 11. |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 5:24pm |
|||
Thank you, nice and concise. Revisionist history for any agenda really, really irks me. It's wrong. |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Rofl_Mao
Platinum Member
request denied Joined: 27 October 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 5:26pm |
|||
I dunno man, the wikipedia article on that states that's a controversial opinion.
Edited by Rofl_Mao - 07 November 2012 at 5:29pm |
||||
![]() |
||||
scotchyscotch
Gold Member
Currently awaiting brand new strikes. Joined: 09 October 2006 Location: Scotland Status: Offline Points: 1911 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 5:44pm |
|||
|
What does it matter? If the majority of the population are of a certain religion then their decisions/actions will undoubtedly be influenced by their beliefs which then leads to a country being termed as "Christian".
The difference lies in what I see to be implied by people wanting to apply that label. Does this mean that in that country the beliefs of the Hindus, Buddhists and Wiccans are no longer valid as it doesn't fit the Christian template? Is it the Christians trying to project some kind of unanimous support for their ideals?
I think the whole "No law establishing religion blah blah" line really does put the point across that although maybe inspired or connected by "Christian values" the countries conscience is not of one single religion and no attempt should be made to assume that it is or act on that assumption. I live in what is technically a Christian country and I would argue that we don't actually give it as much credit as you lot. |
||||
|
Big Jock Knew
<MBro> shut your face you scottish bastard The Reaper "And yet... His facebook says he "likes" Coons..." posting on a phone for a while so excuse the spelling and grammar you cants. |
||||
![]() |
||||
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 5:46pm |
|||
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States#Religion
"Lambert (2003) has examined the religious affiliations and beliefs of the Founders. Of the 55 delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention, 49 were Protestants, and two were Roman Catholics (D. Carroll, and Fitzsimons). Among the Protestant delegates to the Constitutional Convention, 28 were Church of England (or Episcopalian, after the American Revolutionary War was won), eight were Presbyterians, seven were Congregationalists, two were Lutherans, two were Dutch Reformed, and two were Methodists. A few prominent Founding Fathers were anti-clerical Christians, such as Thomas Jefferson[18][19][20] (who created the so-called "Jefferson Bible") and Benjamin Franklin.[21] Others (most notably Thomas Paine) were deists, or at least held beliefs very similar to those of deists.[22] Historian Gregg L. Frazer argues that the leading Founders (Adams, Jefferson, Franklin, Wilson, Morris, Madison, Hamilton, and Washington) were neither Christians nor Deists, but rather supporters of a hybrid "theistic rationalism".[23]" Also Separation of Church and State: In the United States, the term is an offshoot of the phrase, "wall of separation between church and state", as written in Thomas Jefferson's letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in 1802. The original text reads: "Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between Church and State." Jefferson reflected his frequent speaking theme that the government is not to interfere with religion. Sorry to just copy/ paste wikipedia (follow the sources if you want) but it sure doesn't sound even remotely like the founding of a christian nation. In fact, it sounds like they were pretty specific about it NOT being a christian nation. |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
usafpilot07
Platinum Member
FreeEnterprise's #1 Fan & Potty Mouth Joined: 31 August 2004 Location: Tokelau Status: Offline Points: 4311 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 6:11pm |
|||
|
Not that our modern interpretation of separation of church and state necessarily bothers me, I've always thought that in the context of the time period, it was a measure to prevent a government from forcing changes onto religion like the King did so frequently, not an effort to remove influences of theology entirely from the construction of a moral government.
Who gives a **edited** anyways, that's all gone out the window now. Edited by usafpilot07 - 07 November 2012 at 6:12pm |
||||
|
Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo
|
||||
![]() |
||||
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 6:37pm |
|||
|
"Things have changed" is a fine argument, but if people want to play that game, you kind of discredit your own constitution as well, since things have changed a hell of a lot since those days too.
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Rofl_Mao
Platinum Member
request denied Joined: 27 October 2008 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 3111 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 7:02pm |
|||
To be honest, so has the constitution. |
||||
![]() |
||||
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 7:30pm |
|||
|
Well then back to the main point, whether documents have been updated, and times/ values have changed, America was absolutely not founded as a christian nation, and those who claim it was don't fully understand their own history.
Whenever I hear someone passionately use it as an argument, this is all I can think of |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
rednekk98
Platinum Member
Dead man... Joined: 02 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 8:16pm |
|||
|
Christianity and philosophy have changed quite a bit since then as well. A lot of enlightenment-era thinking was certainly based on the teachings of Jesus, but applied with a reverence for the natural world as it was instead of relying solely on scripture to find universal natural truths, and they drew heavily on philosophical methods of those heathen Greeks. Thinking outside of scripture to find truth is something many modern christians don't have the stones to do. That's why they have to assume all scientific evidence that is not obviously and literally in compliance with the Bible is Satan's lies. Which is why you get ideas like carbon-dating is either a trick of the devil or a test by God. Evangelicals have quite historically recently made Biblical literalism mainstream, like, since the Dixicrats jumped ship. Prior to that, except in times of massive and horrible turmoil, we've embraced a protestantism that placed a lot of value on natural law and reason over canon. Evangelism today seems intent on reinventing the pre-reformation Catholic church. Since 9/11 people have been taking a hard look at religion. Some saw what we were facing and decided we need to be as committed to our values as the enemy was/is to theirs, and found this by running for the most basics of the majority religion. Evangelism is big in the military, so there must be some degree of truth in this. Others swung hard to what they perceived as our secular values of striving for social equality and tolerance, and of those, some have become more skeptical of religion. Because of this, and our changing media, ways of worship, and communication, I don't think we've been seeing too many vocal "Turn the other cheek" type of christians, and many moderates on both sides of the aisle seem apathetic.
On another note, I don't think I've managed so many micro-essays in such a short period of time since I was an undergrad.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
__sneaky__
Platinum Member
Voted 2010 Most Improved Forumer Joined: 14 January 2006 Location: Uncertain Status: Offline Points: 5234 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 8:30pm |
|||
|
Americans are by majority a Christian people.
America is not a theocracy. Ergo, America is not a "Christian Nation." We are a nation of mostly Christians. That change of syntax makes for a pretty big difference.
|
||||
|
"I AM a crossdresser." -Reb Cpl
Forum Vice President |
||||
![]() |
||||
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 11:13pm |
|||
That part stood out to me. "These religious extremists did something terrible....we need to be more extreme with our religion." Edited by choopie911 - 09 November 2012 at 2:11am |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
rednekk98
Platinum Member
Dead man... Joined: 02 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 November 2012 at 11:25pm |
|||
|
Freudian slip?
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 567 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |