![]() |
Occupy leaders attempt to blow up bridge in Ohio.. |
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
| Author | ||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2012 at 1:08pm |
|||
|
inb4 whale saying he sees nothing wrong with any of this... and the reporters must be lazy or something...
Lol.
|
||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||
![]() |
||||
tallen702
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Swearing on Facebook Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 10496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2012 at 12:24pm |
|||
|
In related news: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-05-20/news/ct-edit-protesterhd-20120520_1_molotov-cocktails-nato-summit-chicago-police
Mind you, it apparently isn't front-page news that occupy members were planning on firebombing the president's campaign office, Rahm Emmanuel's house, and police barracks. Guess the BeeGees are much more newsworthy than any of this.... |
||||
![]() |
||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2012 at 12:12pm |
|||
|
Another example...
Look at the headline... Wow, really? Do they teach bias like this at Columbia? Clearly |
||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Mack
Moderator Group
Has no impulse! control Joined: 13 January 2004 Location: 2nd Circle Status: Offline Points: 9696 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19 May 2012 at 12:45pm |
|||
|
Yeah, I brought this thread back. Mainly because I saw an article in yesterday's paper that reminded me of the discussion tallen, whale and FE were having regarding media bias. I hunted around until I found it online.
Link
Why did I think this applied? Compare the title and the second paragraph. There are other things in this article that bug me, but the aforementioned is the big issue. |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 09 May 2012 at 11:11am |
|||
|
Awe, how cute, 50 occupiers went to the court to support their brothers in arms...
Course, if you read the media, some how they missed that part of the story... Lol. http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/sns-rt-us-usa-security-clevelandbre84611t-20120507,0,805955.story
"More than 50 supporters crowded the courtroom to see the "Cleveland Five," as they have been dubbed"... Strange how they didn't say 50 occupy members... Oh well, as usual, you have to go across the pond to see the link covered by the media. We are finally seeing the major media starting to realize that their bias is hurting their coverage... Of course Romney "flip flops" while Obama "evolves". Because the authors of the articles support Obama, and don't support Romney... Edited by FreeEnterprise - 09 May 2012 at 11:53am |
||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||
![]() |
||||
StormyKnight
Platinum Member
Joined: 28 July 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 2897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 May 2012 at 12:37am |
|||
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 2012 at 12:13pm |
|||
So, let's assume Rep. Cleaver was indeed making up the story. A congressman says he was spit on. The media reports his claim as a claim. Why is this the problem of the media for reporting the congressman's claim and not the problem of the congressman for making it up, exactly?
As I recall, the situation in question was one segment of a talking head session on MSNBC. Is this what you are assumedly categorizing as encompassing "the media" now?
What about the coverage?
So, in your opinion, this sentence should be breaking news across the country?
Edited by agentwhale007 - 07 May 2012 at 12:13pm |
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 2012 at 12:00pm |
|||
Until someone comes up with a viable time machine, it will most likely be impossible to fire someone for a professional transgression until the action takes places. Every profession has crappy people who will act improperly. The person who decided to edit down the Zimmerman tape was a crappy person who acted improperly, most likely to fuel his or her work getting on the air and getting played (Selfishness and narcissism, folks say, lead to fabrication by newsmakers far more often than bias). And, in turn, the person was fired when it was discovered what they had done. Safeguards exist, and safeguards do fail, sadly. Also, the Zimmerman NBC tape, while a horrendous breach of ethical behavior on the part of the person who edited the tape, and a serious breach of oversight from the person's higher-up producer, is not applicable to what we are currently discussing -- the identification of politically affiliated fringe groups by the media when covering their negative actions.
Considering the number of news broadcasts, news papers, news magazines, and news websites that are published and distributed around the clock, all being composed by human beings, "regularly" is most likely a bit of a stretch.
|
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 May 2012 at 7:49am |
|||
|
It happens all the time...
How about the tea party spitting on a congressman... Made up. Tons of camera angles, and the congressman recounted later, after the damage was done. How about the story about the "gun toting tea party guy" that the media edited to make it look like he was a white male... Turns out, he was black. But, that didn't fit the liberal narrative, that the tea party was "racist" so they edited it to make it look different. Or the stories about Arizona trying to FOLLOW THE LAW and crack down on illegals... The liberal narrative doesn't like states trying to follow the law when it applies to their voting base... Oh wait, did I say that out loud. Lol. Anyway, it is all typical, Whale never sees the media doing anything wrong, even when it is abundantly clear. Guess I'll be waiting a LOOOONG time for the major media in our country to cover this story, huh... "Suspect in bridge bombing plot signed lease on Occupy Cleveland warehouse"
|
||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||
![]() |
||||
tallen702
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Swearing on Facebook Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 10496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 May 2012 at 5:48pm |
|||
After the fact. After it had been sent out to the nation as a whole. Whale states that they do the best with what they have with at the time. Patently false blanket statement when issues like this occur regularly (rigged SUVs anyone?) Again, first impression is a lasting one, media outlets know this. Rather than checking, and double checking the facts, this type of thing happens. |
||||
![]() |
||||
evillepaintball
Platinum Member
Using other peoples accounts isnt nice Joined: 08 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4750 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 May 2012 at 11:04am |
|||
|
An integrity violation was brought to their attention, they investigated it, and they fired those responsible. I don't see the problem with this.
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
tallen702
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Swearing on Facebook Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 10496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 05 May 2012 at 10:29am |
|||
|
Because journalists and new media would never say anything that wasn't true
Goes hand in hand with FE's retraction argument as well. |
||||
![]() |
||||
evillepaintball
Platinum Member
Using other peoples accounts isnt nice Joined: 08 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4750 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 1:42pm |
|||
|
I have seen many complaints in this thread about "if these were TEA Partiers/right-wingers/mitiamen/etc. the media would have xxxxx." The one thing I have yet to see in this thread, is anyone complaints backed up with a concrete example. Surely a headline blaming the right shouldn't be hard to find if they are so common. A tip, in Google news search, on the left side, you can customize a date range for your search.
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 1:17pm |
|||
Ah. In that case, I don't think one is qualified to say:
As opposed to saying that anecdotally it seems as if the media is more quick to identify right-wing groups as opposed to left-wing groups. That is something you are indeed qualified to say. And, the purpose of that seemingly semantic clarification is that "seems" can be clouded by perception and positioning.
Edited by agentwhale007 - 03 May 2012 at 1:19pm |
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
tallen702
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Swearing on Facebook Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 10496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 1:10pm |
|||
|
I seriously doubt anyone has taken the time to quantify them, but seriously Whale, take a look back at all the big events like this to the OK City bombings and tell me that the major news organizations have focused more on getting it right than getting it out there.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 12:41pm |
|||
Do you have available statistics for this claim?
|
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
tallen702
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Swearing on Facebook Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: Under Your Bed Status: Offline Points: 10496 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 11:42am |
|||
I'd like to agree with that Whale, but given previous examples, I can't. Sensationalism breeds fear, fear breeds ratings, and ratings drive dollars. Back to the militia scenario mentioned earlier. Major news outlets have (in the past 20 years at least) always been much more apt to make unsubstantiated ties to right wing groups in initial reports than they have been to hold back and get it right. They'll jump on the "fringe armed militia member" bandwagon and then retract later instead of doing what they're doing in this case saying it's a lone-wolf thing and only then linking them definitively to Occupy. FE is also unfortunately (for the human race that is) correct in that the first news headline/story is the one that people remember and identify as the truth. Again, it seems like Occupy got a pass on this one. Truthfully, I'm surprised I'm not seeing more cries of "Haymarket" on this one.
I know you're talking to FE with that one, but it still doesn't address the apparent bias mentioned earlier. I think perhaps one of the biggest examples is the OK City Bombing. While McVeigh and Nichols weren't active members of ANY militia organization (and were generally shunned by many of them) the media latched onto the idea that they were without checking the facts before reporting. |
||||
![]() |
||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 11:24am |
|||
|
Problem with your story is that all the media had access to the official complaint when they wrote their stories.
You know, the "facts" that were presented in COURT... In that document that was the basis for the entire story from all outlets, (as that is how the media found OUT about the attempted bombing) it clearly links these guys to the occupy movement, as that is WHERE the FBI informant FOUND these guys... I realize you don't want to accept reality, but really... ALL THE STORIES were written based on the facts in the official criminal complaint, which clearly ties them to the Occupy movement. Only ONE media outlet produced the official complaint (CBS). Where the public could dig for themselves to find the facts of the case, since clearly writing them from the complaint wasn't something the media could handle without tainting the story to fit their liberal ideology. |
||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||
![]() |
||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 11:10am |
|||
Or, for those of you out there who are fans of Occam's Razor: The media rolls with the information they can be absolutely sure about at the given moment. Or, at least tries to be as careful as they can about what they claim to be sure about. So, articles written within an hour, or a few hours, of a breaking news event will most likely contain less information than one written two days later -- as the one two days later has allowed those involved to confirm information during those days. Or, you know, it's a grand conspiracy.
|
||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||
![]() |
||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 03 May 2012 at 11:04am |
|||
|
WRONG... It is HIGHLY effective to mislead the general public.
Here is why, something happens. Media writes story, hides facts that don't fit the liberal narrative. Put story on front page and POOF, the majority of the public reads these stories... Other outlets pick them up, and a narrative is born. Media knows they will be called out for blatant omission of facts, so they "update" the story later, when story is no longer on front page... They write other little stories with the facts that are buried way deep into the news cycle, hidden from plain sight, but searchable if you know what to look for. Public knows nothing unless they dig, like you just did. THAT is what they do, again, and again, and again. It is done on purpose, and as usual, you see nothing wrong... Our media is corrupt.
|
||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Post Reply
|
Page <1234> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |