![]() |
Speaking of budget cuts... |
Post Reply
|
| Author | ||||
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6704 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Speaking of budget cuts...Posted: 20 March 2012 at 3:07pm |
|||
|
Even though this kind of ties in to the NASA discussion, I wanted to stick in its own thread to keep from hijacking a great discussion.
First of all, linky linky. (Link doesn't work...it's on the front page of Drudge if you want to read it) So, this is kind of a two part discussion. First of all, the elephant in the room (pun totally intended), the GOP cuts. Most of you guys that have been around for a while know that I've always been pretty far right wing. I say that because I don't want to come off as bashing the right or the GOP in general, even though I have. But what about this plan did Ryan think would appeal to the American people during an election season? When I first saw the headline where the GOP proposed 5 million in cuts, I was like "Hey, awesome move guys, make it look like you're actually working to help the problem instead of just complaining." Honestly, I'm still glad to see they put something together, but dear lord you put a cut to domestic welfare programs AND a corporate tax cut in the same bill? I'm not saying the idea is completely unsound...I really don't pretend to be an economic guru. I don't know if corporate tax cuts are successful in our generation or not, but talk about some bad PR. Combine this with the fact that the GOP lead man is almost certainly going to be Mitt Romney, this puts the GOP in a very awkward, evil-corporate-monster position. Really, the only people I can see this bill appealing to are the far right wing tea partiers, and it seems like we established early on that they constitute a fringe element more than an actual voter base. This won't win them the election is what I mean.
I'm not sure how I feel about this. Some of you (stares at Whale) will have more of an educated opinion that myself. I'm a big fan of passing more power to the states, but it seems to me on the surface that the states would just turn to the federal government for assistance in funding anyway.
Urgh, again I'm no expert, but I really hate to see education cuts in any form.
That was from the White House, so obviously there's going to be some political bias. But that's the vibe I get as well...breaks for corporate America while the low end continue to get hammered. Of course, that's my humane side talking. In reality corporate America foots the lion share while those on government assistance are really just receiving more than giving. But I've become a little more humane as I've gotten older, and frankly I still fail to understand why we're giving money to oil companies. Hopefully one of you can explain that as well. The second part of this discussion is really just the obvious-at least plans are being made I guess, but when will the real plan surface? Both parties can only come up with partisan demands and no compromise while the economy continues to bleed money. It's not a fun topic, but totally relevent to our current dilemma and really the election in general.
Edited by stratoaxe - 20 March 2012 at 3:08pm |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Online Points: 1498 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2012 at 3:15pm |
|||
|
Meh, let Fed print more money. As long as I don't live to see the consequences.
|
||||
|
Remember these words. Bank Holiday.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2012 at 3:29pm |
|||
ಠ_ಠ |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
stratoaxe
Platinum Member
And my axe... Joined: 21 May 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6704 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2012 at 3:38pm |
|||
Huh?
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
SSOK
Platinum Member
The Savior of Christmas Joined: 01 September 2005 Location: PRNJ Status: Offline Points: 5344 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2012 at 4:43pm |
|||
|
Impulse is a Ron Paul addict, and therefore, is one of the Fed haters.
Ergo, throw out there a comment saying "Let the agency that Ron Paul says is bad continue digging us into a grave"
|
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
impulse418
Gold Member
Joined: 25 November 2010 Location: Phx, AZ Status: Online Points: 1498 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2012 at 5:37pm |
|||
|
Its amazing that our taxes go towards the interest, that our government owes to a private bank. Or the mere fact that if all debt was paid off, there would be zero monies if circulation. God bless fractional reserve banking.
|
||||
|
Remember these words. Bank Holiday.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
ammolord
Gold Member
Joined: 06 July 2007 Location: Williston, ND Status: Offline Points: 1818 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2012 at 7:45pm |
|||
|
||||
|
PSN Tag: AmmoLord
XBL: xXAmmoLordXx ~Minister of Tinkering With Things That Go "BOOM!"(AKA Minister of Munitions)~ |
||||
![]() |
||||
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 March 2012 at 8:35pm |
|||
Or that new bills already have interest, constantly increasing the debt as well as inflation. |
||||
|
||||
![]() |
||||
Post Reply
|
|
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |