 |
Deer Hunting/Optics. |
Post Reply 
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
Eville 
Platinum Member 
Strike 1 - 5/19, Filter-dodge Joined: 19 September 2008 Status: Offline Points: 3083 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 15 April 2012 at 10:28am |
|
Man, your definition of inexpensive is very different from mine.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
kickinwing2010
Gold Member 
Strike 3 - Bestiality & Peer Pressured Joined: 05 September 2006 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1929 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 April 2012 at 11:47am |
|
I did get one, I ended up picking up a cheap scope from my room mates brother for $50. It came with the rear cover mount etc. I have since taken it off and I am rocking the iron sights. Found out that everyone is right and you can't keep the scope zero'd in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eville
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - 5/19, Filter-dodge Joined: 19 September 2008 Status: Offline Points: 3083 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 April 2012 at 12:21pm |
|
Gotta get the rear sight replacement mount. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
merc
Platinum Member
American Scotchy Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: VA, USA Status: Offline Points: 7109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 April 2012 at 4:58pm |
|
i got a few of the 6-24X50 scopes for $200correction $100 each a few months ago... that sounds like a good deal to me...
they have aimpoint sites for half the price of the name brand? thats not inexpensive? Edited by merc - 15 April 2012 at 5:43pm |
|
|
saving the world, one warship at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
evillepaintball
Platinum Member
Using other people’s accounts isn’t nice Joined: 08 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4751 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 April 2012 at 5:39pm |
|
I would consider that mid-range. Inexpensive to me is $100 or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
merc
Platinum Member
American Scotchy Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: VA, USA Status: Offline Points: 7109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 April 2012 at 5:41pm |
|
found the reciept... they were 99.95 each, i thought they were 199... i think the original price was that or higher.
edit: after looking at vortex's other lines i can see why they arnt viewed as inexpensive... but the crossfire line isnt too bad... Edited by merc - 15 April 2012 at 5:48pm |
|
|
saving the world, one warship at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
evillepaintball
Platinum Member
Using other people’s accounts isn’t nice Joined: 08 March 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4751 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 April 2012 at 5:55pm |
|
That's not bad then. The $1900 razor 2 line is definitely not what I would call inexpensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rednekk98
Platinum Member
Dead man... Joined: 02 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2012 at 9:00pm |
|
http://www.tech-sights.com/
Increase your sight radius and focus better |
|
|
|
|
merc
Platinum Member
American Scotchy Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: VA, USA Status: Offline Points: 7109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2012 at 9:09pm |
|
i need a set of those for my 10/22
|
|
|
saving the world, one warship at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
rednekk98
Platinum Member
Dead man... Joined: 02 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2012 at 9:42pm |
|
I had a Williams installed before they were available for the 10/22, those are much more handy.
|
|
|
|
|
merc
Platinum Member
American Scotchy Joined: 10 June 2002 Location: VA, USA Status: Offline Points: 7109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2012 at 10:16pm |
|
the williams or the tech sights are more handy?
|
|
|
saving the world, one warship at a time.
|
|
|
|
|
rednekk98
Platinum Member
Dead man... Joined: 02 July 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8878 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2012 at 11:01pm |
|
For the Williams sight, I needed to tap and extra hole in the receiver, they may have specific 10/22 sights now. It of course required a taller front sight, and I went for a white bead. It's good for game, but not terribly precise. I used glow-in the dark paint on the front sight, and since when I remove the aperture I have a ghost-ring, I painted two white dots on it so I have night sights. I'd still rather go Tech sights since they have flip apertures, and are M-16 compatible. For Williams, you need to pay extra for click adjustments, but you can add nice globe front sights.
|
|
|
|
Topic Options|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.