![]() |
Worst disaster in U.S. History |
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 12> |
| Author | ||||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 1:36pm |
|||||
|
You say that there is a "new" democratic party, and yet... which party advocates abortion? There is no question about that, it is the democrats.
Which party promotes "values" that actually tear down the family unit?
Again, no question, democrats. They are the party of welfare (Obama is doing the best job EVER at getting people on welfare roles, as he is the welfare president), the party of "everyone deserves the rights of home ownership" (Barney Frank), the party of spend, and spend, and spend, putting the burden not on their voting block, but the producers of the country, and then whining about the producers not paying their fair share....
Democrats ran EVERYTHING for years now, and what did we get? No budget, just massive spending, and now they want to keep spending so they can keep their power, and the little guy (that liberals are supposed to care about) gets the shaft. Do you really want me to pull the statistics on unemployment among the poor in todays "Obama" economy?...
Course, if they had their way, there would be less of those pesky poor, as they would just abort them on the taxpayers dime.
Oh wait, whale said I was wrong about that... And all the left wing media has trumpeted that this wasn't the case... Will they now change their tunes when the facts are out there?...
and yes, it was the democrats behind it.
And planned parenthood is all about abortion, and they get tax dollars, so don't tell me they put "that" money in a different place, as that has been proven false by high ups AT PLANNED PARENTHOOD.
|
||||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 1:51pm |
|||||
Glad to see that you hold your biases as fact, and anyone who disagrees with you should be ridiculed and mocked. Nothing like a teacher that can't keep their biases at the door, and must indoctrinate their students to the "right" way of thinking by mocking other ways... Jon Stewart would be proud.
Nothing like a little tolerance in the world from the more enlightened of society.
Tell me Dune, when you are ridiculing people with Christian world views, do you label them as "Christian" or just "extremists"?...
Do you ever consider that many of the students are just rolling their eyes behind your clearly biased viewpoints, and smiling and nodding in agreement to keep their grades up because they know your bias is so obvious that if they disagreed with you, they realize you probably would give them bad grades, and pick on them in class to brow beat them until they agreed with your tolerant "values"?
"I teach about people like you in class". What exactly do you mean by that?
|
||||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 1:52pm |
|||||
I'd venture to guess that the correction answer to this is "neither." I don't believe anyone involved in government - or really anyone in general - advocates in favor of abortion. I do think, however, one party tends to support it as a legalized option more than the others.
A strange discussion, to claim that welfare is something that tears down the family unit. But a dodge of topic, none-the-less.
False.
The link you provided is an interesting situation, but it's not indicative of Federal tax dollars funding abortions across the U.S. It involves a rather complex situation with the District of Columbia not actually being a state, and not having the same governmental structure as the rest of the country. They've been audited many times before, and while those audits have shown problems in medicaid/medicare billing (Which should be investigated like any other claim), I've not read anything showing a problem with Federal monies paying for abortions. Interesting case, in DC, but not relevant.
False. It is, as you know, about 3% of their total interactions. The vast majority of their customer interactions - about 35% - involve contraceptives. Either distributing free condoms or charging a discounted rate, I think about $11, for basic birth-control pills.
That is how allocation of money occurs in almost every instance of everything. It's silly to pretend otherwise.
Edited by agentwhale007 - 08 July 2011 at 1:55pm |
||||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Donald Blake
Member
Joined: 02 May 2011 Location: Family Farm Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 1:54pm |
|||||
Hey, look - a cogent, intelligent, nuanced argument by FE.
Oh well - I guess it couldn't last. |
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:00pm |
|||||
|
I teach how people who follow one side politics can have a negative impact on the government. I show them extreme views of the left and the right and how the stubborn attitudes of the two sides hurt the American people. I never said anything about Christian values, that's just you pretending to be a victim while up on your cross. It must be lonely up there. Each religion gets the same time and detail in my class, as it is important to explain their patterns, how they have spread across space and time, and their core values. In addition, I also teach Darwin and his beliefs as an idea and how it has spread and developed.
Edit: My theory on teaching is that it is very important for students to make up their own minds about issues. You can't downplay one issue over another, or religion. Objectivity is the key, and it is the job of the teacher to leave their subjectivity out of it. For you to insinuate that I bully my kids with the threat of grades to get them to follow my views is beyond pathetic and serves more of an example as to how disrespect for our educational system is contagious and is very harmful to our future population. Edited by Dune - 08 July 2011 at 2:06pm |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Mack
Moderator Group
Has no impulse! control Joined: 13 January 2004 Location: 2nd Circle Status: Offline Points: 9696 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:03pm |
|||||
What's incredible is how this turned into an abortion thread. |
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:04pm |
|||||
That's the most disappointing part. The original topic, while presented with a healthy dose of hyperbole, is rather interesting.
|
||||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Ceesman762
Platinum Member
Time for a C-Section! Joined: 15 November 2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 4617 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:07pm |
|||||
|
And no one seen FE changing a thread to something about religion, morals, abortion, democrats, republicans, left, right, Jesus, The Pope, legos, ponies, or Obama?
|
||||||
|
Innocence proves nothing
Tippmann Forum Militia Commander On the S.S. FE Embargo |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Donald Blake
Member
Joined: 02 May 2011 Location: Family Farm Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:07pm |
|||||
Umm... :) |
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:08pm |
|||||
Ahh, the 3% talking point... Here I will prove that wrong, yet again...
"Yet according to PPFA’s own March 2011 Planned Parenthood Services fact sheet, 332,278 abortions were performed on some of PPFA’s three million clients in the year ending June 30, 2009. This suggests that eleven percent of their clients had abortions in that year, not three percent. But the best measure of how important abortions are to PPFA’s bottom line is the fact that abortions produce at least 37 percent of PPFA revenues “by very conservative estimates.”[1]
PPFA has also expanded these lucrative abortion services, adding surgical or “medical” (RU-486) abortion to the services offered at an additional 75 clinics between 2005 and 2009. In that period, PPFA’s total annual abortions grew 25 percent,[2] while other services declined. For example, prenatal care clients numbered 7,021 in the most recent year (down 60 percent in the last five years),[3] and adoption referrals to other agencies numbered only 977, compared to 4,912 in 2007, (see page 7) a remarkable 80% drop in adoption referrals in only two years.
Due to this increase in abortions and decrease in prenatal care and adoption services, 97.6 percent of PPFA “services” for pregnant women in 2009 involved killing their children, and only 2.4 percent involved prenatal care or adoption referral."
|
||||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:08pm |
|||||
That was my fault. I should be reported.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Donald Blake
Member
Joined: 02 May 2011 Location: Family Farm Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:09pm |
|||||
Maybe we can rescue things by turning it into an evolution thread? Hey FE, do you own any dogs? |
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:12pm |
|||||
This was incorrect, upon examination. About 35% of their interactions are STD testings. So rubbers and pills are not a majority that could be considered "vast." Although you were probably smirking because of my use of majority instead of the more specific term of plurality. However, I don't think "majority" is inherently wrong, just not as specific as it could be. Saying that something is a "plural majority" is probably the most-right there . . . . . . you know what, this thread has already ventured into the abortion debate. I'm not going to lead it down the path of being a linguistics debate too.
![]() |
||||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:14pm |
|||||
|
||||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:24pm |
|||||
That is, of course, the point I was making. "Pro-choice," is exactly that. It is for the ability to make the choice of abortion. It's not support or enjoyment or even advocacy of the procedure itself - it's simply the push to maintain it as a legalized option.
You originally asked which party "advocates abortion." The answer is neither. One tends to advocate the choice of abortion, though.
Your "proof" was one situation in a particularly interesting setting - A quasi-half-sate that's not run like a state but sort of is. I believe, at least looking at what is presented in the article, that the abortions took place. I don't believe, however, that this is indicative of the rest of the U.S. Nothing you've posted so far shows that as being the case, unless you rely on extrapolation of DC to the rest of the U.S., which is a geographical fallacy.
One, I'm taking things presented by a pro-life and anti-science website with a grain of salt. However, that article suggests that the percentage of interactions involving abortions are somewhere around 11% instead of the previously presented 3%. Neat, but still doesn't counter-balance your previous claim, which is that Planned Parenthood is "all about abortions." Even putting abortions at 11% of interactions, it's not close to contraception sales and STD testing. Also, the article makes the same conflation as other pro-life claims on the subject: It conflates expenses/earnings with total percentage. Yes, Planned Parenthood most likely makes more money from providing abortions than their other interactions. When you ignore the intentional conflation, though, it's obvious that a medical procedure is going to cost more than selling discounted birth control pills, or running STD tests.
Edited by agentwhale007 - 08 July 2011 at 2:25pm |
||||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Donald Blake
Member
Joined: 02 May 2011 Location: Family Farm Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:26pm |
|||||
Math fail, all across. PP's statement was that abortions make up roughly 3% of services. This is consistent with data provided by PP. Giving Lifenews the benefit of the doubt here, I will say they noticed that "services" is different from "patients," and many/most patients receive more than one "service" - that must be true, since PP had roughly 3MM patients and provided more than 11MM services during the period in question. So Lifenews is correct in observing that most likely, more than 3% of people that walk through PP's doors have abortions. They are NOT correct, however, in concluding as they do that 11% of PP's patients have abortions, for that self-same reason: services are not evenly distributed. Some patients will have multiple abortions in a year, thereby reducing the number of patients having abortions - which is of course why you measure these things by services in the first place. So PP's statement is correct when read correctly. When mashed up and mangled, like Lifenews did, then it looks wrong. |
||||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:47pm |
|||||
|
The linked article had planned parenthoods actual numbers cited... So it wasn't them making up figures, it was planned parenthoods actual numbers (which many people say are skewed for political purposes anyway by counting a single visit as multiple visits if it ISN'T abortion)...
Planned parenthood counts every visit for an abortion as 1 visit. So they can skew their numbers as they know that the media will cover their backside.
Here is the latest report from a credible organization that states abortion is the service that 12% of planned parenhood customers receive.
pg 7.
Course, the media holds such control over people that even when shown the proof, they still don't believe...
|
||||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 2:56pm |
|||||
Even if this is true, it still does not support your previous claim of:
How exactly is, even assuming that it is at 12% (Which the Thunder God did a good job of explaining), abortion all about what Planned Parenthood is?
Edited by agentwhale007 - 08 July 2011 at 2:58pm |
||||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 3:03pm |
|||||
|
read the report, and you will see how they are changing their focus because of the money they make from abortion. It is very clear how their focus has dramatically changed over the years.
but, please stop repeating the 3% number, as it is a lie.
|
||||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 3:06pm |
|||||
|
||||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Post Reply
|
Page <12345 12> |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |