 |
Worst disaster in U.S. History |
Post Reply 
|
Page <1234 12> |
| Author | |||||
FreeEnterprise 
Platinum Member 
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 07 July 2011 at 3:36pm |
||||
Because you don't know the truth doesn't mean the truth isn't real...
Clearly you don't know much about Margaret Sanger, eugenics or the push to eliminate "undesireables" in our society, by the democratic party...
|
|||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
|||||
 |
|||||
|
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 3:57pm |
||||
FE for forum comedian 2011!!! Oh..you were serious.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 4:22pm |
||||
Apple+F "Abortion" . . . Nope. A quick scan of the article . . . It's about unfortunate sterilization programs for those deemed "feeble" back when folks still thought eugenics was a reasonable route.
An article that intentionally blurs the lines between "force" and "coercion," and applies a falsely presented solution to a geographical fallacy.
Largely a collection of irrelevant - albeit incredibly unfortunate - anecdotes involving either malpractice or domestic abuse. Neither of which have much to do with legal abortion. Some mighty fine evidence'n, Lou.
|
|||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 4:31pm |
||||
That goes both ways FE, just because you "know the facts" doesn't mean that everything you spew isn't complete garbage. It is. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Gatyr
Platinum Member
Strike 1 - Begging for strikes Joined: 06 July 2003 Location: Austin, Tx Status: Offline Points: 10298 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 5:33pm |
||||
|
It's pretty incredible just how much FE hates the democratic party.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
choopie911
Platinum Member
Commie Canuck Joined: 01 June 2003 Location: Canada Status: Offline Points: 30712 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 5:42pm |
||||
|
Well if they forced you to kill all your unborn babies whenever they felt like it to further their socialist regime, wouldn't you too?
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 6:30pm |
||||
There is also this as the apparent presented contradiction in your false generalizations against abortion. On one hand, you claim, and have claimed multiple times, that abortions are forced upon women by society, by their partners, and by abortion doctors and Planned Parenthood. Yet, somehow, you also claim, and have claimed multiple times, that abortions are a casual birth control method used by callused, morally lacking women who get the procedure done out of simple convenience. These two claims - even if they were representative of a majority of abortion patients, which I largely doubt - are simply not compatible. Either the women are innocent and are being duped into abortions by others, or they are doing it themselves because of convenience. Attempting to argue both, in the same thread no-less, is a quick way to make your argument seem a bit silly. |
|||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
Mack
Moderator Group 
Has no impulse! control Joined: 13 January 2004 Location: 2nd Circle Status: Offline Points: 9699 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 6:38pm |
||||
Why . . . . . . you starting a binder?  Great Falls, MT. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
GroupB
Gold Member 
Joined: 05 September 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1255 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 6:46pm |
||||
|
FE, why on Earth would a party intentionally kill off their voting base?
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Mack
Moderator Group
Has no impulse! control Joined: 13 January 2004 Location: 2nd Circle Status: Offline Points: 9699 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 6:48pm |
||||
|
GroupB, repeat after me.
"Conspiracy theories are immune to the laws of common sense." |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
High Voltage
Platinum Member
Fire in the disco Joined: 12 March 2003 Location: 127.0.0.1 Status: Offline Points: 14178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 7:14pm |
||||
|
Eville, they only aborted babies they determined were conservative.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Donald Blake
Member 
Joined: 02 May 2011 Location: Family Farm Status: Offline Points: 161 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 7:18pm |
||||
Well, the GOP does like to send the conservative-leaning military into harm's way whenever possible, so it appears to be a bipartisan policy. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
GroupB
Gold Member
Joined: 05 September 2010 Status: Offline Points: 1255 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 07 July 2011 at 7:29pm |
||||
|
Yeah, but a lot of the military likes it. Therefore, a lot of babies must like being aborted!
|
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
*Stealth*
Platinum Member
Watermarked Joined: 31 October 2002 Location: Ethiopia Status: Offline Points: 10702 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 1:28am |
||||
|
I wonder if FE believes the general populace of women to be on equal intellectual terms to men?
This may be a bit of an aside, but if FE believes women are being force/coerced into non-desirable abortions, or in the other instance: too ignorant/lazy to care. He must, by the nature of these statements, also believe women to generally be morons. Just curious... Maybe I'm the only one who sees that correlation. |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
FreeEnterprise
Platinum Member
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC Joined: 14 October 2008 Location: Trails Of Doom Status: Offline Points: 4711 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 8:06am |
||||
|
It is sad how you guys always want to make everything = one specific example... Life is about choices, and you can't put everyone into one catagory. Just follow the evidence, and that will point out issues that have moral consequence. It doesn't mean EVERY example will follow that narrow path, but that also doesn't mean that NONE of the examples are inaccurate.
There is plenty of evidence that there are women being coerced into having abortions when they don't want one. Why would someone coerce someone to do that? Well, a likely reason is they believe in Margaret Sangers utiopia of eugenics. Undisputed fact is almost every planned parent"hood" is located in the 'hood'. That is by design. Also, I AM paying taxes, which are used to fund abortions... That is coerced payment for abortion, and any taxpayer who believes that abortion is morally wrong is paying for it, how is that "fair"?
But, that doesn't fit your preconcieved notions so you can't believe it.
There is also plenty of evidence that Margaret Sanger was a racist and thought that using eugenics she could wipe out the undesireables from our culture. Even wiki covers it in detail.
but, that doesn't fit your preconcieved notions so you can't believe it.
There are plenty of examples of democrats that were part of the KKK, I had a cross burned in my front yard as a kid by the KKK, because my mom was teaching black children at the school at Ft. Bragg in NC. I remember seeing the guys in hoods in my front yard. I had to deal with getting beat up for being white and my mom teaching blacks... And for some weird reason they weren't saying they loved republicans in their town...
Course, that doesn't fit your preconcieved notions, so you can't believe it.
Why don't you guys prove that planned parenthood wasn't founded by margaret sanger, a devout eugenics believer and didn't put all of the clinics in the hoods of America so she could "weed" out the "undesireables".
And while you are at it, you can also prove that the KKK (hmm a mob) wasn't part of the democrat machine.
|
|||||
|
They tremble at my name...
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
High Voltage
Platinum Member
Fire in the disco Joined: 12 March 2003 Location: 127.0.0.1 Status: Offline Points: 14178 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 9:31am |
||||
|
This again?
http://tippmann.com/forum/wwf77a/forum_posts.asp?TID=186222 Yeah, nothing changed since the last time you tried the whole Democrats = KKK thing. You're still wrong. Funny that your right wing blog post doesn't make any mention of the KKK supporting Democrats splintering off from the Democrat party and joining the Republicans. That's top shelf journalism right there. Are you beginning to see why we don't accept blogs like that as credible sources? |
|||||
|
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 10:53am |
||||
Says the guy that said all thousands of babies in the United States have been murdered because of convenience. Since that is the only reason a woman would ever choose an abortion. You tried that whole Democrats = KKK thing. I'm glad you know your history, trying to correlate them today is just a sad attempt. I teach about people like you in class. When we discuss general belief systems, I always have to discuss those out-liers on both ends of the political system. I give examples of things people similiar to you believe as well as things that those on the extreme left believe. The kids get a kick out of conspiracy theories and fear-mongering from both sides.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 11:21am |
||||
Fair enough. And I certainly believe that this occurs, albeit not as the majority. But the issue then is with stopping the people - often family members - from doing the coercing. Making sure that proper counciling exists. Etc. Banning the option of abortion because some are coerced to get one is a solution wrapped in geographical fallacy. Also, it's not me who is trying to force everything into one example - you've presented both of these contradictory accusations before in separate places as the majority situation as to why abortion is bad. Either women are being forced, in the majority. Or women are doing it for convenience, in the majority. You cannot have this argument both ways.
False.
I'm not sure there is anyone out there who has looked into it that doesn't believe that Sanger was a proponent of passive eugenics. It was, unfortunately, popular for her time as a school of thought. Many people who we find to be intelligent contributors to society now also believed in eugenics. However, I'm unclear as to what that has to do much with the modern-day Planned Parenthood.
How many of the modern Planned Parenthood locations in existence today were hand-selected in their location in 1930? Could it be, perhaps, that instead of this being an anti-black conspiracy of location going back to the 1930s, that most modern Planned Parenthoods are in sections of town where it's possible to find an area with low rent and low overhead? And that, statistically, due to a wide array of socio-economic conditions, blacks people often live in those areas of town with less-expensive rent and property values?
Again, I'm not sure anyone doubts that. It is, of course, historically accurate that the KKK was largely parallel in ideology with the early Democratic party in the south. Of course, I also understand that it was during a time when before the political parties in the U.S. had an ideological transition. At one point in time, the Democratic party was the conservative party, whereas the Republican party was the at-first progressive, then more mildly liberal, party. Then, beginning in the 1950s (Some say in the 40s, so that's a thing) the parties had a slow series of growing pains, and each shifted around in their ideology. Third parties emerged and died off (Dixiecrats), and it ended with the Republicans being the conservative party and Democrats being the liberal party. Thus the fact that at one point in time the South was the bastion of Democratic voters, whereas the Northeast was the bastion of Republican. These voting patterns switched as well to where they are today. This is something factual, well-understood, and taught in pretty much every history textbook, yet you don't believe it. |
|||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
|||||
|
|||||
|
Dune
Platinum Member
<placeholder> Joined: 05 February 2004 Status: Offline Points: 4347 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 12:48pm |
||||
|
Democrats use to be involved with the KKK, and Republicans use to be Progressives. That word just burns FE's ears. However, you're absolutely right. That movement really set it's roots with McKinley. So if one of those isn't true anymore, neither is the other one. The transition was not overnight, but a long list of platform changes starting in the mid 1930s and lasted until the mid 1960s.
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
agentwhale007
Platinum Member
Forum's Vladimir Lenin Joined: 20 June 2002 Location: GNV FLA Status: Offline Points: 11644 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 08 July 2011 at 1:14pm |
||||
Yeah, I mean, the 1900 election is probably the very first inkling of the transition, I figure. McKinley was a conservative-leaning progressive Republican, and Jennings Bryan was a liberal-leaning, yet still conservative Democrat. Then when someone shot McKinley and Roosevelt took over, having a rather extreme liberal-progressive was too much against business to make the Republican party leaders comfortable, so they gave him the boot. While the lines didn't fully change until the 1950s and 1960s, I think the 1900 election was the very early catalyst.
|
|||||
|
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists. |
|||||
|
|||||
Topic Options
choopie911 wrote:|
Post Reply
|
Page <1234 12> |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.219 seconds.