Tippmann Pneumatics Inc. Homepage
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Weiner on a grill... Hot dog. lol

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
Author
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:27am
Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

No, here is a bigger picture for you.  Brooklyn is dominated by Israelis and Russians.  Wiener is from Brooklyn.  His campaign money is coming directly from the Kremlin and Tel Aviv.  It is all part of the secret agenda by the Obama administration for social engineering/Communism/Socialism.     I have to take my tin foil hat off now because Major League Baseball is messing with my reception with ancient Mayan witch doctors.
Wait. I thought Obama hated Israel?

That is what THEY want you to believe!
I KNEW it! Man your bunkers!
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Forum's Vladimir Lenin

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: GNV FLA
Status: Offline
Points: 11696
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:29am
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

No, here is a bigger picture for you.  Brooklyn is dominated by Israelis and Russians.  Wiener is from Brooklyn.  His campaign money is coming directly from the Kremlin and Tel Aviv.  It is all part of the secret agenda by the Obama administration for social engineering/Communism/Socialism.     I have to take my tin foil hat off now because Major League Baseball is messing with my reception with ancient Mayan witch doctors.
Wait. I thought Obama hated Israel?

That is what THEY want you to believe!
I KNEW it! Man your bunkers!

This is a conspiracy that goes all the way back to the failing NY Mets management. 


"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists.




Back to Top
FreeEnterprise View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC

Joined: 14 October 2008
Location: Trails Of Doom
Status: Offline
Points: 4785
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FreeEnterprise Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:29am

you got me... I wasn't talking about posting a blog post on the front page of papers. I was talking about how I haven't yet seen a news story from the "lamestream media" that talks about how wiener should be gone because actions like this open him up to being blackmailed.

To accept behavior like this from our elected officials is unbelievable. But, even more troubling is the way many in the media have pretended this isn't a problem...
 
Journalists of old wouldn't have ignored that obvious question and it would have entered into the stories, since we see examples of other questions with a liberal slant in so much of our "news" anyway... To pretend news isn't a big "blog" anyway is silly. Everyone has biases and world views, which shape their "reporting"...
They tremble at my name...
Back to Top
Ceesman762 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Time for a C-Section!

Joined: 15 November 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4810
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ceesman762 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:30am
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

No, here is a bigger picture for you.  Brooklyn is dominated by Israelis

Funny enough, from looking at the front-pages from New York today, the Hamodia didn't cover the Weiner thing. 

You'd figure he being in New York and being Jewish would put him front and center. 

I am going to SWAG this one, I feel the Jewish community in Brooklyn, very large Hassidic population, doesn't like him? I am saying this because in those areas of Brooklyn, mainly around Coney Island, you don't find political/"vote for me" posters or advertisements. Just my observation from my last trip to Coney Island.  That me be a completely different case in Bed-Stuy.
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!


Back to Top
Ceesman762 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Time for a C-Section!

Joined: 15 November 2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 4810
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ceesman762 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:32am
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by Ceesman762 Ceesman762 wrote:

No, here is a bigger picture for you.  Brooklyn is dominated by Israelis and Russians.  Wiener is from Brooklyn.  His campaign money is coming directly from the Kremlin and Tel Aviv.  It is all part of the secret agenda by the Obama administration for social engineering/Communism/Socialism.     I have to take my tin foil hat off now because Major League Baseball is messing with my reception with ancient Mayan witch doctors.
Wait. I thought Obama hated Israel?

That is what THEY want you to believe!
I KNEW it! Man your bunkers!

This is a conspiracy that goes all the way back to the failing NY Mets management. 



Exactly.  They destroyed Shea stadium to hide Jimmy Hoffa's body.
Innocence proves nothing
FUAC!!!!!


Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Forum's Vladimir Lenin

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: GNV FLA
Status: Offline
Points: 11696
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:39am
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

  I wasn't talking about posting a blog post on the front page of papers.

Oh, ok. 

Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

This blog posting is what SHOULD have been on the front page of every paper in the country today...

Quote that talks about how wiener should be gone because actions like this open him up to being blackmailed.
 

I've not read much this morning on the scandal, but typically the way news stories work, at least in print, is they are a collected report of what others have said, and available sourced information. 

If someone has said he should be resigned, by all means, that person or people should be sourced in the article. But you're suggesting that the reporters themselves ought be the ones calling for Weiner's resignation. That's the confusing part. 

Are you suggesting that a newspaper have their reporters advocate for particular issues in their news articles? 

Or are you suggesting that newspapers run opinion pieces on the front page? 

Which is it? 




Edited by agentwhale007 - 07 June 2011 at 10:40am
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists.




Back to Top
FreeEnterprise View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC

Joined: 14 October 2008
Location: Trails Of Doom
Status: Offline
Points: 4785
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FreeEnterprise Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:48am

The video is linked on this thread... AT the press conference Breitbart brought up the fact that this was a news story because weiner was acting in a way that opened him up to blackmail.

 
So it was part of the story at that point, yet it was ignored by the media... and I haven't seen a single story that talks about that obvious problem with a sitting congressman trying to e-hook up with young women on the web like a horndog.
 
So clearly this WAS part of the story, yet it didn't hit the stories.
 
That is bias, plain and simple, as a reporter, it should have been part of every story, as it is the reason why this matters.
 
Seriously watch breitbarts "hacking" of the press conference called by weiner. I linked it on page 2. Explain to me how that can be ignored when it was made clear by Breitbart WHY this was important, as it opened him up to blackmail.
 
To NOT report on that part of the press conference is clearly ignoring THE POINT of why this is the story... (according to breitbart WHO BROKE THE STORY)...


Edited by FreeEnterprise - 07 June 2011 at 10:48am
They tremble at my name...
Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Forum's Vladimir Lenin

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: GNV FLA
Status: Offline
Points: 11696
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 10:58am
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

So it was part of the story at that point, yet it was ignored by the media...
 


Link


Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

  I haven't yet seen a news story from the "lamestream media" that talks about how wiener should be gone because actions like this 







Edited by agentwhale007 - 07 June 2011 at 11:00am
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists.




Back to Top
Mack View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Has no impulse! control

Joined: 13 January 2004
Location: 2nd Circle
Status: Offline
Points: 9819
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mack Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 11:22am
Wow.  Given the media reversal, the admission of other similar behaviors and the lack of support from the Democratic party for this Weiner, I would have to say that my Mackstradamus predictions were right on.  Furthermore, I would like to point out that the predictions of my savant alter-ego have proved 100% accurate for those that have come true so far.*

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

How exactly do you blackmail someone by threatening to expose them for something that is now public knowledge?



I think FE means that he was open to blackmail before the situation became public knowledge.  And, given the integrity that Weiner has shown in handling this situation, I have to admit that any fears that he might have sold the country down the river to protect his privates on this issue if blackmailed are probably justified.

Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

If someone has said he should be resigned, by all means, that person or people should be sourced in the article. But you're suggesting that the reporters themselves ought be the ones calling for Weiner's resignation. That's the confusing part. 

Are you suggesting that a newspaper have their reporters advocate for particular issues in their news articles? 

Or are you suggesting that newspapers run opinion pieces on the front page? 

Which is it?


This.  It is not the place of the news media to add opinions to factual news articles.  With that said, my personal opinion is that they have a better record of not adding opinions to reports of left-wing wrong doing than they do to reports of right-wing wrong doing . . . but that might just be my personal bias in action.


*Yes, that was FE logic . . . I couldn't resist.  (Although honestly I do think I am having a pretty good batting average with predictions--I should go back and check some of the others.)


Edited by Mack - 07 June 2011 at 2:35pm
Back to Top
FreeEnterprise View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC

Joined: 14 October 2008
Location: Trails Of Doom
Status: Offline
Points: 4785
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FreeEnterprise Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 11:32am
Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

So it was part of the story at that point, yet it was ignored by the media...
 

 
Nothing about the possibility of a congressman being blackmailed in that article...

Link
Nothing about the possibility of a congressman being blackmailed in that article...

 
Nothing about the possibility of a congressman being blackmailed in that video package...
Nice how that video package uses the typical mainstream media meme that breitbart "selectively" edited the Sharrod footage... when I posted that original footage here... And if anyone had read it or watched the video they would know the truth about that... But, clearly people make up "facts" and run with them by repeating them over and over even thought they are clearly false. He had in that original article/ video the footage/words that showed she realized how she was wrong and helped the man. The story was about how the NAACP was racist as the speech was in front of them and they were clapping and "alright"ing the racist comments she made. But, that doesn't fit the narrative, so that is ignored, and this false meme is repeated everytime a "liberal" gets ahold of anything breitbart.
 
pathetic example of "today's biased journalism".

Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

  I haven't yet seen a news story from the "lamestream media" that talks about how wiener should be gone because actions like this 


Nothing about the possibility of a congressman being blackmailed in that article...



 
 
Here is the press conference again. Notice how 3:45 that never makes it into the narrative of the stories... No accountability when the left invents spin and tries to destroy their "opponents". He states the main point of covering the story is that the congressman is lying (and when lying, blackmail is clearly the issue at hand) at 5:10 he talks about "why did you put this on the web?" ONLY AFTER a sitting congressman said he had been "hacked" and after ALL of his photos had been pulled and the woman pulled her facebook, AND twitter... (attempting to cover up the evidence... because if it is out there, it can be used against him by a blackmailer...)
 
10:00 is an unbelievable rant against the media and calls them ALL out, which they don't have a single example of him lying in ANY of his stories. NOT ONE...
 
 
 
 


Edited by FreeEnterprise - 07 June 2011 at 11:35am
They tremble at my name...
Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Forum's Vladimir Lenin

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: GNV FLA
Status: Offline
Points: 11696
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 11:52am
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

Nothing about the possibility of a congressman being blackmailed in that article...


So, despite the myriad coverage of the scandal, despite it being in a total of 134 newspapers this morning*, despite the story being on the front page of a good portion of those newspapers, including a majority of the New York newspapers**, there is bias shown because they don't bring up the concept of blackmail?

*According to the NewsBank: America's Newspapers academic database.
**According to the Newseum Daily Front Pages.

"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists.




Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Forum's Vladimir Lenin

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: GNV FLA
Status: Offline
Points: 11696
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 11:58am
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

I haven't seen a single story that talks about that obvious problem with a sitting congressman trying to e-hook up with young women on the web like a horndog.


I'm also quite confused by this statement. Almost everything I've read about it today mentions him sending lewd photos to women on the Internet, as well as his confession of infidelity. 

And, there has yet to be a response to the questions proposed after your suggestion that newspapers should be running opinion pieces or blogs on the front pages of their products: 

Originally posted by agentwhale007 agentwhale007 wrote:

 

Are you suggesting that a newspaper have their reporters advocate for particular issues in their news articles? 

Or are you suggesting that newspapers run opinion pieces on the front page? 

Which is it? 





Edited by agentwhale007 - 07 June 2011 at 12:03pm
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists.




Back to Top
FreeEnterprise View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC

Joined: 14 October 2008
Location: Trails Of Doom
Status: Offline
Points: 4785
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FreeEnterprise Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:02pm
Who, what, when, where, WHY...
 
The WHY to this story as to why it matters if a CONGRESSMAN is caught doing something and lying about it is clearly a major part of a story... Especially since the leftwing media has made it clear that "who cares" as I have chronicled in this thread.
 
Well, anyone in a position of power, controlling the purse strings of the nation who puts themselves in a position where they can be blackmailed... THAT is the "why" people should care about this story, and "Why" it matters.
 
At least according to the journalism classes I took in college, WHY was always a major point to a story.
 
To ignore that in the articles you linked clearly shows a major reporting bias...


Edited by FreeEnterprise - 07 June 2011 at 12:03pm
They tremble at my name...
Back to Top
oldpbnoob View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not old, Not noob. May be Dave's grandma

Joined: 04 February 2008
Location: Yankee Stadium
Status: Offline
Points: 5676
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote oldpbnoob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:04pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

How exactly do you blackmail someone by threatening to expose them for something that is now public knowledge?

?
"When I grow up I want to marry a rich man and live in a condor next to the beach" -- My 7yr old daughter.
Back to Top
FreeEnterprise View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC

Joined: 14 October 2008
Location: Trails Of Doom
Status: Offline
Points: 4785
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FreeEnterprise Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:08pm
Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

Originally posted by oldpbnoob oldpbnoob wrote:

How exactly do you blackmail someone by threatening to expose them for something that is now public knowledge?

?
 
 
Well, clearly this guy has a problem with young women... And never in history have nefarious people who know that someone has a sex problem used that to gain influence or blackmail them...
 
oh wait... Yes... yes they have...
 
I guess you think he wouldn't do something that stupid after yesterday... oh wait, clearly he would since yesterday happened from his stupid decisions...
They tremble at my name...
Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Forum's Vladimir Lenin

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: GNV FLA
Status: Offline
Points: 11696
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:12pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

 The WHY to this story as to why it matters if a CONGRESSMAN is caught doing something and lying about it is clearly a major part of a story...
 

And there has been myriad coverage of his actions and the repercussions of his actions, at least in the databases I have access to. There have been 134 stories this morning. 

If the coverage date is expanded back to June 1, 2011, that number of printed articles jumps to 452. 

None of them I've read this morning have not mentioned that Weiner was a congressman, and that Weiner admitted to lying. 


Quote Especially since the leftwing media has made it clear that "who cares" as I have chronicled in this thread.
 

I've yet to see a news article suggesting - itself - "who cares."

I've seen opinion pieces on the matter. 
 
Quote  
To ignore that in the articles you linked clearly shows a major reporting bias...

Every news article I've read mentions that he was caught in a lie. 

So, is your basis of the news coverage being bias simply coming down to them not using the term "blackmail?" 
"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists.




Back to Top
High Voltage View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Fire in the disco

Joined: 12 March 2003
Location: 127.0.0.1
Status: Offline
Points: 14179
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote High Voltage Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:13pm
A House ethics investigation has been started, the congressman publicly admitted his guilt and your beloved Breitbart got his apology.

Why are the wheels of the outrage machine still in motion?
Back to Top
agentwhale007 View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Forum's Vladimir Lenin

Joined: 20 June 2002
Location: GNV FLA
Status: Offline
Points: 11696
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote agentwhale007 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:15pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:


I guess you think he wouldn't do something that stupid after yesterday... oh wait, clearly he would since yesterday happened from his stupid decisions...

"So when Romney wins in a landslide, what will the liberal media do?"
This Ma**edited**hine Kills **edited**as**edited**ists.




Back to Top
FreeEnterprise View Drop Down
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Avatar
Not a card-carrying member of the DNC

Joined: 14 October 2008
Location: Trails Of Doom
Status: Offline
Points: 4785
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FreeEnterprise Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:28pm
Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

A House ethics investigation has been started, the congressman publicly admitted his guilt and your beloved Breitbart got his apology.

Why are the wheels of the outrage machine still in motion?
 
Maxine Waters and Charley Rangle are still in office...
 
Excuse me if I find "ethics investigations" to be a big partisan sham, when they clearly don't result in the expulsion of corrupt congressman/women in a timely manner...
 
 
Almost a YEAR since that "decision near" article...
 
They tremble at my name...
Back to Top
Mack View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar
Has no impulse! control

Joined: 13 January 2004
Location: 2nd Circle
Status: Offline
Points: 9819
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mack Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07 June 2011 at 12:37pm
Originally posted by FreeEnterprise FreeEnterprise wrote:

Originally posted by High Voltage High Voltage wrote:

A House ethics investigation has been started, the congressman publicly admitted his guilt and your beloved Breitbart got his apology.

Why are the wheels of the outrage machine still in motion?
 
Maxine Waters and Charley Rangle are still in office...

Which is apparently where their constituents, stupid as it may be, want them to be.  It's called "democracy."
 
Excuse me if I find "ethics investigations" to be a big partisan sham, when they clearly don't result in the expulsion of corrupt congressman/women in a timely manner...

This, I agree with.  However, that only makes it my opinion . . . and my opinion carries little weight against the votes of those who kept the people mentioned in office.  (It's that pesky democratic process thing again.)
 
 
Almost a YEAR since that "decision near" article...
 


Edited by Mack - 07 June 2011 at 2:36pm
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12345 8>
  Share Topic   

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 10.03

This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.