Clinton Strikes Back

RicWhic414 wrote: Clark Kent wrote: Jack Carver wrote: So we should thank FSM, or chance, or luck, or whatever force of nature or supernatural you belive in, that led us to be born where we were. If I have to thank FSM for that, can I also curse FSM for not making me an ultrarich rockstar with magical longevity genes? is there such thing as a rockstar is longevity genes?? cuz they all do drugs and get into accidents

Keith Richards is still alive, isn't he?

Definitely some noodly appendages at work in that one.

RicWhic414 wrote: keith richards is only 63 so hes not that old

In rockstar years that's like 437.

RicWhic414 wrote: anyone who has the balls to go sign up to be in the armed forces is more of a man then i believe any of us will ever  be and i would like to thank you everyday for keeping us safe and free

How did this ever get past me. When you finally get your nose out from their backsides, how can you say everyone who joins the military is more of a man (and women since they do allow them in) than any of us? So to go further, the young men and women that try to join the military in order to delay or in some cases option out of their jail sentences...they are better than me and the other forumers? Give me a break. I won't put down our military, but don't overdue it here.

Edited by Dune - 28 September 2006 at 6:23pm

blackdog144 wrote: i hate clinton...though i hate most liberals...well not hate them but i hate there views...just me though...

That's why you're a moron.


Edited by Bolt3 - 29 September 2006 at 11:01am

RicWhic414 wrote: umm i believe burning a flag is illegal... unless you are disposing of a flag.

Illegal in many countries around the world, but a constitutionally protected right in the US of A.  Burn all the flags you want.

RicWhic414 wrote: I was just saying that when people bash the government they go straight to the pres. like he is the only one doing things in this country... when you should speak out to your reps. of your state (there the ones that make the laws) bush can veto them but they can get it passed him with the right number of votes

You are letting Bush off too easy.  Bush has never vetoed anything, and no faction in Congress has anywhere near the votes needed to override a veto if he did.

Bush doesn't approve these bills because he feels bullied by Congress - rather the other way around.

That said, Congress is certainly entitled to its share of blame, and I don't think they have been let off the hook by anybody.  They are taking a fair beating as well.  But since Bush represents the executive branch all by himself, he is entitled to the same amount of blame/credit as the entire Congress combined.

yes i do say so also but in this thread no one from what i saw said anythin about hating congress of the senate... and also think about this bush has a cabinet behind him that tell him what to do... and if people think he is such an idiot then that means the top advisers in this country are idiots too

well good im glad that is the way you are... because i no that if i had a problem with somethin the only thing you can do is get a bunch of people that feel the same way and start callin your reps.. and if it means that much to you keep at it... and i no when it comes to our views i think that we should agree to disagree and just leave it at that... and its always good to debate things in our government because debates are what make the government become better... you have 2 sides they yell and scream and as long as the end results in a compromise then you no it is the best for the public

oldsoldier wrote: And your explinationsn for Ted Kennedy, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters (flag on mars?)in positions of power?

Ted Kennedy - I have no major problem with Ted.  Wouldn't let him near my sister, but he is basically harmless.  He has become a bit of a party hack over the last few decades, but no more or less than a bunch of other people.

Pelosi - Not really on my radar.  Name is vaguely familiar, I probably should know who she is, but I don't.

Waters - Same.  I could look both of them up and formulate an opinion, but that would be cheating.

I told you, OS, I wasn't going to cheat.  I posted my comments about DeLay/Santorum without looking them up, so I didn't look up your folks either.

I now have looked them up, and am vaguely embarassed (but not that much) that I didn't recognize Pelosi's name, but am absolutely not embarassed that I didn't recognize Waters' name.  Even after looking her up I still don't know who she is.

And I still have no opinion on either of them.

But to get to the underlying point: OS, you seem determined to stick me in some liberal/Democratic mould, despite how I keep pointing out that I don't fit that mould.  You should stop now.

Edited by Clark Kent - 29 September 2006 at 4:02pm