 |
super rt? |
Post Reply 
|
Page <12 |
| Author | ||
triggerhappy1 
Platinum Member 
Joined: 07 May 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3376 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 13 October 2005 at 9:16am |
|
|
A-5 has the same efficiancy as a 98. With any RT/Cyclone upgrades on either gun it remains the same. The blowback happens after the propelling stage. The extra blowback is a lot more than you think. Efficiancy has been tested and it has concluded same, or very close efficancy. You may experiance higher velocity with co2 because of spikes, inconsistant pressure, ect. |
||
|
||
 |
||
|
Skitz
Member 
Joined: 09 June 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 183 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 13 October 2005 at 2:22pm |
|
|
Do you think an apache would be able to keep up with the Super RT? I've heard they can feed close to 20bps.
|
||
|
Tippmann 98 custom RT
Apache 14" J&J ceramic Black/green hybrid grip Broadsword vest Remote line Proto Switch EL |
||
|
||
|
triggerhappy1
Platinum Member
Joined: 07 May 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 14 October 2005 at 3:38pm |
|
|
Ricochets are agitating hoppers meaning they can not consistantly and steadily feed over 16bps. It should be fine for short bursts just under 20, but not very reliable for much if anything else. tigman250 has an Apache and Super RT, he could give you a more direct answer/advice. |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
ekim98
Member
Joined: 11 February 2005 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 109 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 15 October 2005 at 11:14pm |
|
whom did the efficany test you refer to. i've heard that an a5 with it's cyclone feed and an rt will have more shoot down and to over come this you have to up the velocity , hence you would use more air/co2!! |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
triggerhappy1
Platinum Member
Joined: 07 May 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3376 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 October 2005 at 9:14pm |
|
|
Nooooope. The valve has pretty much a two-step function. Step one is the propelling of the ball where the gas goes from the valve, through the recessions in the valve body, and down the powertube/bolt. Immediantly after this split second, the valve spring starts to push the bolt back, changing the path of the air from the powertube/front bolt to the rear bolt out of the valve body. Within this area is a "notch" like part in the valve body which leads to the hole in the powertube to the RT and out of the valve to propell the rear bolt. And even if you did have to turn up the velocity to cope with any loss, it changes no efficiancy. The velocity screw simply diverts flow through the powertube; the valve is still struck with the same force. A gun with the v-screw all the way in will get the same efficancy with the screw all the way out. Info on A-5s consistancy- http://forum.specialopspaintball.com/index.php?act=ST&f= 40&t=342&s=934417add87eee4fa6a63460904b10cb Same (actualy more) shots with RT than without it. |
||
|
|
||
|
||
|
You Wont See Me
Platinum Member
Found in Big Al’s underwear drawer Joined: 02 December 2003 Location: Neutral Zone Status: Offline Points: 13325 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 16 October 2005 at 9:45pm |
|
Even if that were true, due to the way tippmanns adjust velocity you still wouldn't be using any more gas. Tippmann simply adjust the flow of air instead of the amount of air itself when you adjust velocity, so your using the same amount of air wheather your shooting 180fps or 300fps Edit: darn you trig Edited by You Wont See Me |
||
|
||
Topic Options
triggerhappy1 wrote:|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
This page was generated in 0.171 seconds.