![]() |
wow... discrimination at its finest |
Post Reply
|
Page <1 456 |
| Author | ||||
Dazed
Platinum Member
Romped around naked in thorn bushes Joined: 13 February 2003 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 3863 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2005 at 9:49am |
|||
|
Basically, Senn, what you're saying is that its a "Look, but don't touch" rule, right? As long as people don't actually have intercourse, they are ok.
|
||||
![]() |
||||
DBibeau855
Platinum Member
IIIIIMMMMM BAAACCCKKK Joined: 26 November 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 11662 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2005 at 9:51am |
|||
There are a couple different schools of thoght on this subject, some say the catholic religion was around as a cult before the time of christ, so in reality, catholics are not christians acording to this school of thoght, and some of our practices go directly against the ten comandments. Idols, false gods, praying to the saints. So one could make an argument catholics are not true christians. But as it stands, i think that guy just had an idiot moment. |
||||
![]() |
||||
Clark Kent
Platinum Member
Joined: 02 July 2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 8716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2005 at 3:42pm |
|||
|
I am picking through it with a fine-toothed comb, yes - but not to "disprove", just to clarify. And your explanation of what the Bible prohibits is very different from what I hear from so many others, goes back to my point: It is vague. More to the point, it is TOO vague to base any judgment upon it. The Bible, within some parameters, means what you want it to mean. What kind of rule is that? My point is made further by the many different interpretations people give to the Bible - not just these verses, but the whole thing. If the Bible were clear we would all agree, or at least most of us. But because it isn't clear you get different opinions. That leads me back to the vagueness. If the Bible were passed by Congress, it would be thrown out by the courts as being too vague. And if it is too vague to even send somebody to jail, how can we possibly condemn somebody's soul based on it? |
||||
![]() |
||||
Ejp414
Platinum Member
Joined: 13 June 2002 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 6483 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 April 2005 at 4:08pm |
|||
That's correct, and it's exactly what I said earlier. Unfortunately, he either misunderstood my statement or blatantly avoided it. —probably the former. |
||||
|
__________________
__________________ |
||||
![]() |
||||
Post Reply
|
Page <1 456 |
|
Tweet
|
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |